Victoria Showers??

:tongue:Slow day Sue ????

Pinkpussycat said:

Blimey I've had more excitement watching paint dry. :yawn:

Click to expand...

Give the girl a chance... she's new to all of this jewellery malarkey :sweat:

Ooh...wow :angel:

Avid said:

Give the girl a chance... she's new to all of this jewellery malarkey :sweat:

Click to expand...

Then should she be on telly?

You know, I do understand the point you're making BUT there comes a point when TV channels have to be professional. Viewers shouldn't have to give anybody a chance. The programme should be professional from the start - or at the very least, entertaining. Look at the lovely John Scott by way of an example. He was used to being on telly but not selling jewellery. He was quite blatent about knowing nothing at the start BUT was entertaining and fun to watch despite his lack of knowledge.

I do get fed up that the viewer isn't allowed to criticise without excuses being made for presenters.

Sorry - having a pants day and just needed to get that off my chest! :talking:

Meeshoo said:

Then should she be on telly?

You know, I do understand the point you're making BUT there comes a point when TV channels have to be professional. Viewers shouldn't have to give anybody a chance. The programme should be professional from the start - or at the very least, entertaining. Look at the lovely John Scott by way of an example. He was used to being on telly but not selling jewellery. He was quite blatent about knowing nothing at the start BUT was entertaining and fun to watch despite his lack of knowledge.

I do get fed up that the viewer isn't allowed to criticise without excuses being made for presenters.

Sorry - having a pants day and just needed to get them off my chest! :talking:

Click to expand...

Huh? xxxxxx :thinking::cheeky::hi:

argeybargey said:

Huh? xxxxxx :thinking::cheeky::hi:

Click to expand...

Oyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Lackey - you've been at the creative changing course again haven't you? :cheeky:

Meeshoo said:

Then should she be on telly?

Viewers shouldn't have to give anybody a chance.

I do get fed up that the viewer isn't allowed to criticise without excuses being made for presenters.

Sorry - having a pants day and just needed to get that off my chest! :talking:

Click to expand...

Obviously TJC feel she should be on tv.

Absolutely, people should be given a chance. If every viewer felt the way you do, a lot of people would be out of a job within days of starting! She's been in the job less than two weeks. Most people get 3 month's probation.

And, of course you are allowed to criticise! If it makes you feel better... go ahead :nod:

Me? I'll wait before I pass judgement... for now, the jury's out.

Avid said:

Obviously TJC feel she should be on tv.

Absolutely, people should be given a chance. If every viewer felt the way you do, a lot of people would be out of a job within days of starting! She's been in the job less than two weeks. Most people get 3 month's probation.

And, of course you are allowed to criticise! If it makes you feel better... go ahead :nod:

Me? I'll wait before I pass judgement... for now, the jury's out.

Click to expand...

Then you have far more tolerance than I do. I don't see why I should listen or watch an amateur. In fact, I don't. I turn over. If TJC want me to buy their goods then give me a professional service. I'm not a guinea pig for them to try out presenters on.

If you actually read my post you'll see that I wasn't criticising the presenter I was criticising bad presenting in general. Presenters are the sales tool for the company - if they're bad then they won't sell. Fact. Good presenters sell.

Presenters don't get a 3 month probationary. Most of them are freelance.

Meeshoo said:

May I ask why you seem to defend each and every presenter every time anybody says anything remotely critical?

Click to expand...

Hmmm, this is a loaded question... think I'll pass on answering it. :mysmilie_514: